OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TCIcon indicating the project type

OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

Uploaded image for project: 'OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC'
  1. OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
  2. OFFICE-1937

OWL Ontology in Appendix B must be provided as a separate file

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Applied
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: ODF 1.2
    • Fix Version/s: ODF 1.2
    • Component/s: Schema and Datatypes
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      ODF 1.2 CD02 REV02 conatains an Appendix B. OpenDocument Metadata Manifest Ontology

      This ontology should be provided as a separate file and the appendix should be removed.

        Attachments

          Activity

          Descending order - Click to sort in ascending order
          Hide
          Permalink
          michael.brauer Michael Brauer (Inactive) added a comment -

          Correction appears in OpenDocument-v1.2-part1-cd03-rev01

          Show
          michael.brauer Michael Brauer (Inactive) added a comment - Correction appears in OpenDocument-v1.2-part1-cd03-rev01
          Hide
          Permalink
          michael.brauer Michael Brauer (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          I wasn't clear. What I meant was that 3.2.2 still references Appendix [n], but that appendix [n] just says where to find the ontology file. This way, we have a single but normative reference to the file.

          Show
          michael.brauer Michael Brauer (Inactive) added a comment - - edited I wasn't clear. What I meant was that 3.2.2 still references Appendix [n] , but that appendix [n] just says where to find the ontology file. This way, we have a single but normative reference to the file.
          Hide
          Permalink
          patrick Patrick Durusau added a comment -

          Michael, Yes, but why not simply make that reference under 3.2.2 as a note? Being mindful that the file name does not equal its location.

          Show
          patrick Patrick Durusau added a comment - Michael, Yes, but why not simply make that reference under 3.2.2 as a note? Being mindful that the file name does not equal its location.
          Hide
          Permalink
          michael.brauer Michael Brauer (Inactive) added a comment -

          We somewhere need a reference to the ontology. So, instead of removing the appendix, we may also just remove the ontology, and instead add the following:

          The OpenDocument metadata manifest ontology is defined by a separate document, which is located here:
          OpenDocument-metadata-v1.2-cd02-rev03.owl

          Show
          michael.brauer Michael Brauer (Inactive) added a comment - We somewhere need a reference to the ontology. So, instead of removing the appendix, we may also just remove the ontology, and instead add the following: The OpenDocument metadata manifest ontology is defined by a separate document, which is located here: OpenDocument-metadata-v1.2-cd02-rev03.owl
          Hide
          Permalink
          michael.brauer Michael Brauer (Inactive) added a comment -

          The ontology is available as separate file for

          OpenDocument-v1.2-part1-cd02-rev03

          The appendix may be removed now.

          Show
          michael.brauer Michael Brauer (Inactive) added a comment - The ontology is available as separate file for OpenDocument-v1.2-part1-cd02-rev03 The appendix may be removed now.

            People

            • Assignee:
              patrick Patrick Durusau
              Reporter:
              michael.brauer Michael Brauer (Inactive)
            • Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: