Public Comment: Return of the naughty words and phrases (ODF all versions)

Replace as appropriate:

• "special" (e.g. 18.404 refers to "a sequence of effects that are
  started when the user interactively clicks on a special element inside a
  page").

• "particular" as meaningless padding (e.g. 18.795 "[t]he
  text:date-value attribute specifies a particular date value.") Most of
  the time this word should be deleted or replaced with something
  specific.

• "if and only if" (e.g. 8.1.10 "the table and each distinct group may
  contain one <table:table-header-columns> element, if and only if the
  table columns contained in the <table:table-header-columns> elements are
  adjacent"). A simple "if" will do.

• "a bit" / "a bit like" (e.g. 19.230 "turns around a bit and moves to
  the bottom-right corner of the screen").

• "appropriate" as the sole adjective for some normative behaviour (e.g.
  18.348 "[i]f this attribute is not present, a denominator that is
  appropriate for displaying the number is used").

• "expected to" (18.308 "[t]he form control is expected to react on
  changes in the cell range").

• "relevant" (e.g. 18.269 "[t]he attribute is only relevant if the
  form:repeat attribute is present, and evaluates to true").

I have a couple of queries pending on specific items but the soft counts of corrections are as follows:

• "special" (e.g. 18.404 refers to "a sequence of effects that are
  started when the user interactively clicks on a special element inside a
  page").

– replaced 10 instances

• "particular" as meaningless padding (e.g. 18.795 "[t]he
  text:date-value attribute specifies a particular date value.") Most of
  the time this word should be deleted or replaced with something
  specific.

--replaced 17 instances

• "if and only if" (e.g. 8.1.10 "the table and each distinct group may
  contain one <table:table-header-columns> element, if and only if the
  table columns contained in the <table:table-header-columns> elements are
  adjacent"). A simple "if" will do.

– replaced 5 instances, two pending questions

• "a bit" / "a bit like" (e.g. 19.230 "turns around a bit and moves to
  the bottom-right corner of the screen").

– replaced 3 instances

• "appropriate" as the sole adjective for some normative behaviour (e.g.
  18.348 "[i]f this attribute is not present, a denominator that is
  appropriate for displaying the number is used").

– only one instance might merit replacement but there, number:denominator-value, omits on critical piece of information that makes appropriate work. I added the following note:

****
Note: The number:denominator-value attribute is used with number:grouping 19.350, number:min-denominator-digits 19.352, number:min-integer-digits 19.354 and number:min-numerator-digits 19.355.in defining the display a floating point number as a fraction.
****

In other words, we are always starting with a floating point number and the question is how to display that number as a fraction. (I had an editorial note on this issue, see Office-1682 for that discussion.)

• "expected to" (18.308 "[t]he form control is expected to react on
  changes in the cell range").

– replaced one instance

• "relevant" (e.g. 18.269 "[t]he attribute is only relevant if the
  form:repeat attribute is present, and evaluates to true").

– replaced 5 instances