-
Type: Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority: Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: ODF 1.2 Part 2 CD 1
-
Component/s: OpenFormula
-
Labels:None
-
Proposal:
-
Resolution:
We currently say:
"Applications claiming to implement "Traditional Complex Number Notation" shall allow traditional inline notation for complex numbers, that is, "i" or "j" optionally prefixed with Number produces a type Complex."
That's incorrect. A complex type consists of a real number plus an imaginary number.
Rather than filing a separate JIRA issue, why do we define acceptance of complex types by infix operators here? Isn't this covered by Number as a type already?
What does the "...no required to accept the Text type as equivalent." mean?
Most of this looks like repetition so I am deleting it until the case is made for its return.