Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: New
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: ODF 1.3
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      2.2.1 D) D.3) reads:

      *****

      If a style:condition, table:condition, table:expression, table:formula or text:formula attribute value begins with a namespace prefix bound to namespace
      "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2," the syntax and semantics of the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by the prefix shall conform to part 2 of this specification. If a namespace prefix is omitted at the beginning of the attribute value, the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by a prefix shall conform as if there were a prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2".

      *****

      It looks to me like with or without an explicit namespace prefix, the namespace is the same? Yes?

      If that is the case, why not just say absent a namespace, then ... the namespace?

      If a namespace is declared (should?) then we should say that.

      It's not clear what is meant.

       

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              Patrick Patrick Durusau
            • Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: