-
Type: Bug
-
Status: Open
-
Priority: Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: ODF 1.3
-
Fix Version/s: ODF-Next
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
2.2.1 D) D.3) reads:
*****
If a style:condition, table:condition, table:expression, table:formula or text:formula attribute value begins with a namespace prefix bound to namespace
"urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2," the syntax and semantics of the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by the prefix shall conform to part 2 of this specification. If a namespace prefix is omitted at the beginning of the attribute value, the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by a prefix shall conform as if there were a prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2".
*****
It looks to me like with or without an explicit namespace prefix, the namespace is the same? Yes?
If that is the case, why not just say absent a namespace, then ... the namespace?
If a namespace is declared (should?) then we should say that.
It's not clear what is meant.