"implementation-defined" vs. "implementation defined"

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • ODF 1.4
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Hide

      Apply attribute style to: manifest:PGPAlgorithm

      Insert after manifest:PGPAlgorithm - attribute

       

      Now: manifest:PGPAlgorithm contains

      Fixed: manifest:PGPAlgorithm attribute contains

       

       

       

      Show
      Apply attribute style to: manifest:PGPAlgorithm Insert after manifest:PGPAlgorithm - attribute   Now: manifest:PGPAlgorithm contains Fixed: manifest:PGPAlgorithm attribute contains      
    • Hide

      4.17 manifest:PGPAlgorithm

      The manifest:PGPAlgorithm attribute contains an identifier for the PGP algorithm used for encryption in the manifest. This identifier is implementation defined.

      Show
      4.17 manifest:PGPAlgorithm The manifest:PGPAlgorithm attribute contains an identifier for the PGP algorithm used for encryption in the manifest. This identifier is implementation defined.

      Section 1.2 Terminology in Part 2, ODF 1.3, defines the term "implementation-defined". But I find it as "implementation defined" (without dash) in

      4.16.11  manifest:preferred-view-mode, part 2

      4.17 manifest:PGPAlgorithm, part 2

      3.4 Host-Defined Behaviors, part 4

      In addition, 4.17 has wrong character style in that sentence.

      Having both, makes a search for "implementation-defined" terms unnecessary difficult. So in case not the defined term "implementation-defined" is intended, the wording should be changed to avoid "implementation defined".

      I think, that it should be with dash in 4.17 and consider that as editorial error.

      I'm not sure about the other cases.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Regina Henschel
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: