Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 1.0
    • Fix Version/s: 1.0
    • Component/s: Foundation
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      N/A

    • Proposal:
      Hide

      Based on the description, someone needs to take ownership of this and verify that the single namespace is sufficient for our work and that we have extensibility based on the single namespace. We also need to evaluate if we have a potential for clashes if we only have one namespace.

      Show
      Based on the description, someone needs to take ownership of this and verify that the single namespace is sufficient for our work and that we have extensibility based on the single namespace. We also need to evaluate if we have a potential for clashes if we only have one namespace.
    • Resolution:
      Show
      https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/s-ramp/download.php/47695/s-ramp-foundation-v1.0-wd04-SRAMP-2.docx

      Description

      Issue-002 from the contributed issues Document

      During the course of the work on version 1.0 of the specification, there were issues with namespaces. It
      was finally decided that we should have everything be in the same s-ramp namespace instead of a separate
      namespace for each schema that was defined. From an implementation perspective, having everything in
      the same namespace is easier to implement, but will this guarantee we will not have clashes? We should
      revisit this and make sure this is the correct decision.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              ewittmann Eric Wittmann
              Reporter:
              brunssen Vincent Brunssen
            • Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: