-
Type: Improvement
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority: Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: 1.0
-
Fix Version/s: 1.0
-
Component/s: Foundation
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:
N/A
-
Proposal:
-
Resolution:
Issue-002 from the contributed issues Document
During the course of the work on version 1.0 of the specification, there were issues with namespaces. It
was finally decided that we should have everything be in the same s-ramp namespace instead of a separate
namespace for each schema that was defined. From an implementation perspective, having everything in
the same namespace is easier to implement, but will this guarantee we will not have clashes? We should
revisit this and make sure this is the correct decision.