Normative keywords not distinguish from their common English sense

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Major
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: UBL Naming and Design Rules Version 3.0
    • Component/s: Public reviews
    • None
    • Environment:

      Normative

      Not distinguishing keywords typographically from non-normative regular use of these terms is ambiguous:
      In EXT01:
      “that extension collection shall be optional and not repeated”
      So is "shall" a keyword. Is "optional" a keyword too? How should I guess? Then what does "shall be optional" mean? is there a difference with just "is optional"?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Jacques Durand (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: