-
Type: Bug
-
Status: New
-
Priority: Blocker
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: Business Document Envelope Version 1.0 CSPRD01
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Public reviews
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:
Normative
-
Proposal:
Even if the problems with the various subdirectories are missing, a problem remains with the file references.
The conformance clause mandates conformance to the XML schemas as validation without error.
OK, but under the TC process,
*****
(7a) For Standards Track Work Products:
All normative computer language definitions must be provided in separate plain text files;
Each text file must be referenced from the Work Product; and
Where any definition in these separate files disagrees with the definition found in the specification, the definition in the separate file prevails.
*****
So, where are the additional artifacts that are required to be used with this work product? I don't see an "additional artifacts" section on the cover page nor do I see separate pointers to each of these schemas in the normative language of the draft.