Even if the problems with the various subdirectories are missing, a problem remains with the file references.

The conformance clause mandates conformance to the XML schemas as validation without error.

OK, but under the TC process,

*****
(7a) For Standards Track Work Products:

All normative computer language definitions must be provided in separate plain text files;
Each text file must be referenced from the Work Product; and
Where any definition in these separate files disagrees with the definition found in the specification, the definition in the separate file prevails.
*****

So, where are the additional artifacts that are required to be used with this work product? I don't see an "additional artifacts" section on the cover page nor do I see separate pointers to each of these schemas in the normative language of the draft.