Conformance clause is vague

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Major
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Hospital AVailability Exchange (HAVE) Version 2.0 CSPRD01
    • Component/s: Public reviews
    • None
    • Environment:

      Conformance

    • Hide

      Once there is a meaningful section 4, re-write the conformance clause to reference which general or mandatory requirements are being specified. Be specific.

      Show
      Once there is a meaningful section 4, re-write the conformance clause to reference which general or mandatory requirements are being specified. Be specific.

      The conformance clause (Section 5) references Section 4, which itself references a computer generated PDF file that does not follow RFC2119.

      Under a) - it isn't possible to determine what "general requirements" were intended by the TC.

      Under c) "...meets all the mandatory provisions..." the failure to follow RFC2119 prevents discovery of the mandatory provisions.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Patrick Durusau
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: