Uploaded image for project: 'Technical Advisory Board'
  1. Technical Advisory Board
  2. TAB-1220

Conformance clause is vague

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: New
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Hospital AVailability Exchange (HAVE) Version 2.0 CSPRD01
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Public reviews
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      Conformance

    • Proposal:
      Hide

      Once there is a meaningful section 4, re-write the conformance clause to reference which general or mandatory requirements are being specified. Be specific.

      Show
      Once there is a meaningful section 4, re-write the conformance clause to reference which general or mandatory requirements are being specified. Be specific.

      Description

      The conformance clause (Section 5) references Section 4, which itself references a computer generated PDF file that does not follow RFC2119.

      Under a) - it isn't possible to determine what "general requirements" were intended by the TC.

      Under c) "...meets all the mandatory provisions..." the failure to follow RFC2119 prevents discovery of the mandatory provisions.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              patrick Patrick Durusau
            • Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: