Note in 5 Conformance

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Major
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Hospital AVailability Exchange (HAVE) Version 2.0 CSPRD01
    • Component/s: Public reviews
    • None
    • Environment:

      Normative

    • Hide

      Create a conformance clause that offers alternative ways to conform to the standard and be specific about what each type of conformance requires. Don't point to the schema and say be valid. Specified combinations are better for interoperablity.

      Show
      Create a conformance clause that offers alternative ways to conform to the standard and be specific about what each type of conformance requires. Don't point to the schema and say be valid. Specified combinations are better for interoperablity.

      From the note:

      "only messages that fully comply with the EDXL-HAVE 2.0 specification and that are complete and schematically valid may be referred to as a “EDXL-HAVE 2.0 Message”."

      only -> Only

      "fully comply?" Not defined.

      "that are complete..." Not defined.

      "may" - is this a requirement?

      Is conformance something separate from being complete and schematically valid?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Patrick Durusau
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: