None of the RFC keywords appear to be used

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Minor
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Hospital AVailability Exchange (HAVE) Version 2.0 CSPRD01
    • Component/s: Public reviews
    • None
    • Environment:

      Normative

      Keywords listed in Terminology:
      "The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in Error! Reference source not found.."
      Are not used in this spec, suggesting there is no normative content. You do not have to us these keywords but the normative content should be more clearly indicated. E.g. the conformance clause should explain what is to be interpreted as "requirement". Also, there is a broken ref in this section 1.1.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Jacques Durand (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: