-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: New
-
Priority:
Minor
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.3 CSPRD01
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Public reviews
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:
Style
-
Proposal:
Under Additional Artifacts, the description of part 3 reads in part:
"...It is designed for implementers who want all OASIS-approved specializations."
The same language appears immediately following: 1.1 About the DITA specification: All-inclusive edition, and, following: All-inclusive edition (this edition).
I think you are using "OASIS-approved specializations" to refer to "learning and training specializations." Yes?
I ask because an implementer could "specialize" DITA based on Part 3 and not have an "OASIS-approved specialization." Yes?
Thinking it would be better to explicitly say: "...for implementers who want all specialize DITA for learning and training."
Extension beyond the current standard is certainly possible but then it isn't OASIS-approved.