-
Type: Bug
-
Status: New
-
Priority: Minor
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.3 CSPRD01
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Public reviews
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:
Style
-
Proposal:
1.2 Terminology reads in part:
*****
...as described in RFC 2119 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt).
*****
Shouldn't RFC 2119 be a reference to [RFC2119] which appears in your normative references? Moreover, if so, you can drop the parens and URL here.
BTW, it isn't a big issue but I would drop the repetition of the definitions of MUST, etc. Those are already stated in RFC 2119 and nothing is gained by repeating them here.