-
Type: Bug
-
Status: New
-
Priority: Minor
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.3 CSPRD01
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Public reviews
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:
Style
-
Proposal:
The use of sub-section numbering appears to be inconsistent.
For example, 1.5 Formating conventions in the XHTML version of the specification is followed by what appear to be unnumbered subsections, Link previews and navigation links.
Compare that to 2.1 Introduction to DITA, which is followed by 2.1.1 DITA terminology and notation
Further compare 2.1.1 DITA terminology and notation which is followed by an unnumbered Notation and Basic DITA terminology, Specialized terminology, DITA modules, Linking and addressing terms, Terminology related to keys, and map terms,
with:
2.2.1 DITA topics, which is followed by 2.2.1.1 The topic is the basic unit of information
Why 2 levels, followed by three levels and then by four levels of numbered headings? Scanning the document I am aware that four levels seems to be as deep as you go, although you might want to consider five levels for ease of reference.
Update: I stand corrected! You do have five levels of heading, sometimes, see: 2.3.4.10.7 Example: References to scoped keys. So, why is the fifth level of headings erratic?