-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: New
-
Priority:
Minor
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.3 CSPRD01
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Public reviews
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:
References
-
Proposal:
1.3 Normative References reads in part:
S. Bradner, Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt, IETF
RFC 2119, March 1997.
T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, and L. Masinter, Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax, http://
tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986, IETF RFC 3986, January 2005.
A. Phillips and M. Davis, editors, Tags for Identifying Languages, http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc5646.pdf, IETF RFC
5646, September 2009.
The correct form of these citations are given at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc-ref.txt
As follows:
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>.
Phillips, A., Ed., and M. Davis, Ed., "Tags for Identifying Languages", BCP 47, RFC 5646, DOI 10.17487/RFC5646, September 2009, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5646>.
************
Yes, the RFC 2119 reference is different from that in the TC Admin's template. I need to ask Chet to update the template.