-
Type: Bug
-
Status: New
-
Priority: Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.3 CSPRD01
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Public reviews
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:
Conformance
The conformance clauses should be more specific in referring to the normative body of the specification, and give section numbers. E.g. conformance to different types of DITA processors should be more specific on where the requirements are stated. An exemple: "DITA-aware processor ... supports all the base vocabulary modules". I see vocabulary modules in various parts of DITA, but what are the "base" ones? A section(s) referencing would help disambiguate.