Uploaded image for project: 'Technical Advisory Board'
  1. Technical Advisory Board
  2. TAB-1614

Conformance clauses do not clearly refer to the normative sections

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: New
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: Digital Signature Service Core Protocols, Elements, and Bindings Version 2.0
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Public reviews
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      Conformance

      Description

      The conf clauses must clearly identify what normative parts of the specification they engage. (see OASIS conf clause guideline: http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/TCHandbook/ConformanceGuidelines.html ) For example, we see in section 5 of spec, many MUST requirements. But which conf clause is requiring to satisfy these? The two "document" conf clauses do not seem to refer to any specific schema nor such requirements. The normative sections should be referred to by title + section #.  The two last  client & server clauses read exactly the same! Is a DSS client then the same thing as a DSS server? Be more specific.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              jdurand2 Jacques Durand (Inactive)
            • Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: