Uploaded image for project: 'OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC'
  1. OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC
  2. TOSCA-150

CLOSE - WD02 - Work towards a common syntax for Requirement definitions (currently 3 variant grammars/forms)

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: CSD2
    • Fix Version/s: CSD2
    • Component/s: Profile-YAML
    • Labels:
      None
    • Resolution:
      Hide

      We have rewritten the requirements definition section to the TC's satisfaction.

      Show
      We have rewritten the requirements definition section to the TC's satisfaction.

      Description

      Here is what we have now:

      1. Requirement for a specific named entity (e.g., a Node Type or Node Template)
      • <requirement_name>: <entity_name>
      1. Requirement clause for a specific named Capability Type
      • <requirement_name>: <capability_type_name>
      1. Requirement for a node type with an optional, explicit Relationship type
      • <requirement_name>: <node_type_name>
        relationship_type: <relationship_name>

      Thomas, Derek and Matt believe we can collapse into single grammar.

      Also, we need to expand the definitions to show constraints.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              mrutkows Matthew Rutkowski (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              mrutkows Matthew Rutkowski (Inactive)
            • Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Due:
                Created:
                Updated: