-
Type: Bug
-
Status: New
-
Priority: Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: Profile-YAML
-
Labels:None
-
Proposal:
It seems really strange that for defining the attribute status we use another definition's keyname description.
If thoese are really the same than we should have a STATUS definition that is generic and all that need it use it.
If there is something that is called "something status" should really be used just for "that something" and not for "also something else" somewhere else in the spec.