Line 579 - Why is performance a property of attach, rather then a property of interval/gluon?

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Sub-task
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Priority: Major
    • wd15
    • Affects Version/s: pr01
    • Component/s: schema
    • None
    • Environment:

      PAP04 Marty Burns, Hypertek

    • Hide

      Beacuse we are re-using and adapting a pre-existing standard, we start with the pre-exisitng model. The attachment provides the extension base for nw functions w/o breaking backward compatibility. Under this, the Attach is the extensibility base.

      Show
      Beacuse we are re-using and adapting a pre-existing standard, we start with the pre-exisitng model. The attachment provides the extension base for nw functions w/o breaking backward compatibility. Under this, the Attach is the extensibility base.

      It seems that these are modifiers of the interval not the attach which as I understand it is basically an incorporated reference to another part of the xml document or a remote procedure? Suggest that performance be moved up a level in hierarchy.

            Assignee:
            Toby Considine (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Toby Considine (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: