Uploaded image for project: 'OASIS Web Services Calendar (WS-Calendar) TC'
  1. OASIS Web Services Calendar (WS-Calendar) TC
  2. WSCALENDAR-341

Collector for Reference Checks

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: pr02
    • Fix Version/s: wd21
    • Component/s: spec
    • Labels:
      None
    • Resolution:
      Hide

      All references re-checked and updated

      Show
      All references re-checked and updated

      Attachments

      1.
      		 Line 837 - delete "[reference]" and insert the appropriate reference Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      2.
      		 Line 59 - The current revision is 03 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cal-resource-schema-03). Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      3.
      		 Line 71, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86 - RFC 2447, 3339, 4791, 4918, 5545, 5546, 5988 are a "proposed standard" Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      4.
      		 Line 74 - RFC 2616 are a "draft standard". This is the state before "internet standard". Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      5.
      		 Why are there normative references to WS-Management, WS-Security, DP-WS, XRD, and others including e.g. lines 71, 74, and more? If there is no use of something in a document it seems strange to label it a normative reference. Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      6.
      		 Line 93 - Can you have a normative reference to a non-normative document? Date also seems off. Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      7.
      		 Line 34 - there is no reference for [EITC] and [EMIX]; these should be non-normative references. Likewise EDXL and oBIX on lines 35-36 Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      8.
      		 Line 59 - Is Calendar Resource Schema truly a normative reference? Where is it cited or used? Sub-task Closed Michael Douglass (Inactive)
      9.
      		 Line 105 - Is the "Draft xCal" superseded by the contributions and the work in the schemas that are part of this work product? Reword. Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      10.
      		 Line 119 - The reference should be something like [NIST Framework] - the title has been turned into a reference shorthand by bolding it. Other places this happened is on lines 59, 105 (should be [xCal Draft]), 119, 124, 131,, and maybe 136. Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      11.
      		 Line 124 - I believe that this should be [NAESB_PAP04] and reference both the first and second release. Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      12.
      		 Line 180 - There is no normative reference to which [XCAL] is connected. Perhaps "xCAL Draft" is what's meant? Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      13.
      		 Line 343 - "granularity" is not title case; capitalize. Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      14.
      		 Line 253 "start at a particular instant of time UTC" does not read well. Where is a definition of the acronym UTC? Starting with what is UTC (a single sentence) would make the rest of this section more clear. Is there a normative ref or informative ref? Sub-task Closed Toby Considine
      15.
      		 Section 5 - Conformance and Rules Sub-task Closed Toby Considine

        Activity

          People

          • Assignee:
            Toby.Considine Toby Considine
            Reporter:
            Toby.Considine Toby Considine
          • Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: