Section 2.2.1 - "no representation as whether UTC or local time are more appropriate " - A hard decision here would have provided lots of benefit to interoperability. Flexibility will not help with interoperability.

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Sub-task
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Priority: Major
    • wd20
    • Affects Version/s: pr02
    • Component/s: spec
    • None
    • Environment:

      IRC

    • Hide

      Expanded the resolution discussion.

      The Technical Committee makes no representation as whether UTC or local time are more appropriate for a given interaction. Because WS-Calendar is based on [iCalendar], business practices built upon WS-Calendar can support either. Specifications that claim conformance with this specification may require choices to support their particular business processes.

      Also added additional language (5.2.3) in the conformance Section recommending that specifications that claim conformance make apropriate confomance statements.

      Show
      Expanded the resolution discussion. The Technical Committee makes no representation as whether UTC or local time are more appropriate for a given interaction. Because WS-Calendar is based on [iCalendar] , business practices built upon WS-Calendar can support either. Specifications that claim conformance with this specification may require choices to support their particular business processes. Also added additional language (5.2.3) in the conformance Section recommending that specifications that claim conformance make apropriate confomance statements.

          Assignee:
          Toby Considine (Inactive)
          Reporter:
          Toby Considine (Inactive)
          Votes:
          0 Vote for this issue
          Watchers:
          0 Start watching this issue

            Created:
            Updated:
            Resolved: