General: Why not make Sequence a type of Component? Why not enhance the notion of Partition/Sequence to cope with the need for Streams?

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: No Action
    • Priority: Major
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: STRM CSPRD02
    • Component/s: streams
    • None
    • Environment:

      Benoit LePeuple

      My understanding is that Streams are just a particular kind of Sequence (Partition), a new animal with particular rules of inheritance to minimize the amount of repeated data (by inventing the Stream Payload Base). Why not doing that with animals we already domesticated: A Gluon Payload Base or Sequence Payload Base?

      I do not feel comfortable with such overlapping concepts and specifications.

            Assignee:
            mike.douglass
            Reporter:
            Toby Considine (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: