Is LinkType Class needed? Yes!

XMLWordPrintable

    • Hide

      No Action.

      The abstract class for LinkType is intended for PSM designers to apply whatever referencing/linking approach they require. If this were an ordinary class the comments would be entirely correct.

      Created a separate item to include in Notation section that the purple class background indicates an abstract class. (WSCALENDAR-557)

      Also a separate item to enhance the note in CS01 line 427 quoted in a comment. (WSCALENDAR-558)

      Show
      No Action. The abstract class for LinkType is intended for PSM designers to apply whatever referencing/linking approach they require. If this were an ordinary class the comments would be entirely correct. Created a separate item to include in Notation section that the purple class background indicates an abstract class. ( WSCALENDAR-557 ) Also a separate item to enhance the note in CS01 line 427 quoted in a comment. ( WSCALENDAR-558 )

      From email:
      I noticed that the PIM removed two of the three attributes in the LinkType class (URI and linkedUid, leaving reference). With LinkType only having a single attribute, it becomes somewhat extraneous. Why not just have the RelationLink.link point to the reference as a URI || String || UID as documented for LinkType.reference, rather than pointing to a LinkType that points to reference?

            Assignee:
            William Cox (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            William Cox (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: