Details

    • Resolution:
      Hide

      No Action.

      The abstract class for LinkType is intended for PSM designers to apply whatever referencing/linking approach they require. If this were an ordinary class the comments would be entirely correct.

      Created a separate item to include in Notation section that the purple class background indicates an abstract class. (WSCALENDAR-557)

      Also a separate item to enhance the note in CS01 line 427 quoted in a comment. (WSCALENDAR-558)

      Show
      No Action. The abstract class for LinkType is intended for PSM designers to apply whatever referencing/linking approach they require. If this were an ordinary class the comments would be entirely correct. Created a separate item to include in Notation section that the purple class background indicates an abstract class. ( WSCALENDAR-557 ) Also a separate item to enhance the note in CS01 line 427 quoted in a comment. ( WSCALENDAR-558 )

      Description

      From email:
      I noticed that the PIM removed two of the three attributes in the LinkType class (URI and linkedUid, leaving reference). With LinkType only having a single attribute, it becomes somewhat extraneous. Why not just have the RelationLink.link point to the reference as a URI || String || UID as documented for LinkType.reference, rather than pointing to a LinkType that points to reference?

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              william.cox William Cox (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              william.cox William Cox (Inactive)
            • Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: