Odd construction of RelationLink.link and LinkType.reference

XMLWordPrintable

    • Hide

      Modify cardinality of RelationLinkType:link to be [0..1].

      Consider modifying LinkType:reference cardinality to [1].

      Show
      Modify cardinality of RelationLinkType:link to be [0..1] . Consider modifying LinkType:reference cardinality to [1] .
    • Hide

      Modify cardinality of RelationLinkType:link to be [0..1].

      Show
      Modify cardinality of RelationLinkType:link to be [0..1] .

      from second part of email:

      RelationLink.link is shown as mandatory, with LinkType.reference as optional. This seems an odd construction. If you believe that every instance of RelationLink must link to something, then LinkType.reference should be mandatory. If you think it may sometimes not link to something, then RelationLink.link should be optional.

            Assignee:
            William Cox (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            William Cox (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: