OASIS OSLC Lifecycle Integration for Project Management of Contracted DeliveryIcon indicating the project type

OASIS OSLC Lifecycle Integration for Project Management of Contracted Delivery

Uploaded image for project: 'OASIS OSLC Lifecycle Integration for Project Management of Contracted Delivery'
  1. OASIS OSLC Lifecycle Integration for Project Management of Contracted Delivery
  2. OSLCPROMCO-1

Simplify RDF vocabulary by eliminating redundant inverse properties

    Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Labels:
      None
    • Proposal:
      Hide

      List all the inverse pairs and pick one member from each for the new OASIS version of the RDF vocabulary.
      Be consistent about the grammatical sense of the properties.

      Show
      List all the inverse pairs and pick one member from each for the new OASIS version of the RDF vocabulary. Be consistent about the grammatical sense of the properties.

      Description

      The current design has many pairs of mutual inverse properties. This makes writing SPARQL queries awkward since you have to include both. If you only have one way to express a fact then the queries become easier to write.

        Attachments

          Activity

          Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
          14 older comments
          Hide
          Permalink
          ryman Arthur Ryman (Inactive) added a comment -

          In the proposed model there is still one pair of inverse relations: supercedes and supercededBy. Is this intended or an error?

          Show
          ryman Arthur Ryman (Inactive) added a comment - In the proposed model there is still one pair of inverse relations: supercedes and supercededBy. Is this intended or an error?
          Hide
          Permalink
          ryman Arthur Ryman (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          The relations between “Change” and “ManagedItem are not redundant because they define two different roles that a ManagedItem can have with a Change resource. However, the names are not good grammatically because they do not correctly describe the relation between the Change and ManagedItem. The terms describe the relations between the two ManagedItems.

          A better choice of names is "before" and "after" since one ManagedItem is the before resource and the other ManagedItem is the after resource relative to the Change resource.

          Show
          ryman Arthur Ryman (Inactive) added a comment - - edited The relations between “Change” and “ManagedItem are not redundant because they define two different roles that a ManagedItem can have with a Change resource. However, the names are not good grammatically because they do not correctly describe the relation between the Change and ManagedItem. The terms describe the relations between the two ManagedItems. A better choice of names is "before" and "after" since one ManagedItem is the before resource and the other ManagedItem is the after resource relative to the Change resource.
          Hide
          Permalink
          wakao Masaki Wakao (Inactive) added a comment -

          Change resource was removed from the model as result of Issue 3.
          If there is no more problem in this issue, please close this issue.

          Show
          wakao Masaki Wakao (Inactive) added a comment - Change resource was removed from the model as result of Issue 3. If there is no more problem in this issue, please close this issue.
          Hide
          Permalink
          tomkamimura Tsutomu Kamimura [X] (Inactive) added a comment -

          Since this has been reflected in the current version of the working draft, I will close this issue.

          Show
          tomkamimura Tsutomu Kamimura [X] (Inactive) added a comment - Since this has been reflected in the current version of the working draft, I will close this issue.
          Hide
          Permalink
          tomkamimura Tsutomu Kamimura [X] (Inactive) added a comment -

          This is reflected in the current working draft.

          Show
          tomkamimura Tsutomu Kamimura [X] (Inactive) added a comment - This is reflected in the current working draft.

            People

            • Assignee:
              tomkamimura Tsutomu Kamimura [X] (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              tomkamimura Tsutomu Kamimura [X] (Inactive)
            • Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: