Export - CSV (All fields)
Export - CSV (Current fields)
WSCALENDAR-448
All - Does the standard assuming any type of industry? Specification of interoperability for the energy industry is lacking. Certain assumptions will leave the interoperability more difficult and costly, rather than generic.WSCALENDAR-441
Section 3.1.1 - Choosing one format would benefit interoperability.WSCALENDAR-434
Section 2.2.1 - "no representation as whether UTC or local time are more appropriate " - A hard decision here would have provided lots of benefit to interoperability. Flexibility will not help with interoperability.WSCALENDAR-431
All - The standard provides every possible method to define intervals and schedules while this is clever it does not increase the chance of interoperability.WSCALENDAR-429
Table 1.6 - The definition relate to implementation e.g. "need inheritance" or "not complete" rather than the information that is undefined in this stateWSCALENDAR-426
Abstract - If there is nothing energy sector specific in this standard what benefit does it provide over the other standards mentioned.WSCALENDAR-423
All - the standard does not effectively address the time period definitions that are particular to the wholesale energy marketsWSCALENDAR-420
Line 2678 - "Intervals SHALL NOT include an END time."WSCALENDAR-361
Line 881 - The "optionality" of dtEnd and duration is not clearly definedWSCALENDAR-357
Line 858 - dtEnd says "SCHEDULED completion time..." is this implied or computed or expressed? dtStart simply says "Start time"WSCALENDAR-356
Line 858 - dtEnd is not listed and optional, as are dtStart and duration (DtStart and Duration?)WSCALENDAR-350
Line 368 - Elsewhere it's recommended that intervals have DtStart and Duration (either of which can be filled in through eg inheritance), but we see later an odd blend (line 858 adds DtEnd to the mix). This needs to be clear and consistent across the doc.WSCALENDAR-348
Line 368 - Both DtStart and Duration are "optional". What precisely does that mean? That neither need to be present? we find later that these values can be inherited from a gluon, but at this point "optional" seems to mean "no value is required"WSCALENDAR-281
Line 858 - it is unclear why there is a restriction on using only dtStart and duration, and dtEnd and duration, but NOT dtStart and dtEnd.
{"errorMessages":["jqlTooComplex"],"errors":{}}
[{"id":-1,"name":"My open issues","jql":"assignee = currentUser() AND resolution = Unresolved order by updated DESC","isSystem":true,"sharePermissions":[],"requiresLogin":true},{"id":-2,"name":"Reported by me","jql":"reporter = currentUser() order by created DESC","isSystem":true,"sharePermissions":[],"requiresLogin":true},{"id":-4,"name":"All issues","jql":"order by created DESC","isSystem":true,"sharePermissions":[],"requiresLogin":false},{"id":-5,"name":"Open issues","jql":"resolution = Unresolved order by priority DESC,updated DESC","isSystem":true,"sharePermissions":[],"requiresLogin":false},{"id":-9,"name":"Done issues","jql":"statusCategory = Done order by updated DESC","isSystem":true,"sharePermissions":[],"requiresLogin":false},{"id":-3,"name":"Viewed recently","jql":"issuekey in issueHistory() order by lastViewed DESC","isSystem":true,"sharePermissions":[],"requiresLogin":false},{"id":-6,"name":"Created recently","jql":"created >= -1w order by created DESC","isSystem":true,"sharePermissions":[],"requiresLogin":false},{"id":-7,"name":"Resolved recently","jql":"resolutiondate >= -1w order by updated DESC","isSystem":true,"sharePermissions":[],"requiresLogin":false},{"id":-8,"name":"Updated recently","jql":"updated >= -1w order by updated DESC","isSystem":true,"sharePermissions":[],"requiresLogin":false}]
0.3
0